Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Se debe tener en cuenta: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Archibald Alexander Leach dijo:
Was first reported as region free by Movietyme and later changed to region locked. As you can tell by the movietyme link they reported it as region free... but now have quietly changed it to region locked.
Harmonica dijo:En mi caso, comprar un lector zona A fue mi mejor decisión en el mundo HD, por lo que no puedo dejar de recomendarlo.
Disfruto de todas las películas, no sufro con las regiones y mucho menos con las ediciones patrias![]()
Archibald Alexander Leach dijo:Harmonica dijo:En mi caso, comprar un lector zona A fue mi mejor decisión en el mundo HD, por lo que no puedo dejar de recomendarlo.
Disfruto de todas las películas, no sufro con las regiones y mucho menos con las ediciones patrias![]()
Ídem.
Amén.
Loco Peligrosso dijo:Amigo Conan, el Edge Enhancement, como bien saben los cracks Nacho y Aleksey, se detecta tanto en movimiento como en capturas, como podrás comprobar a continuación. No entiendo cómo ningún reviewer se queja de esto, y lo ponen hasta de referencia. ¿Les da miedo ir contra el hype o qué?
Mirad la chepa del chino para comprobar lo que digo:
http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film2/DVDRevie ... u-ray2.jpg
DIOSSS, MIS OJOS!!!!!![]()
Os lo amplío aquí:
![]()
Aunque a lo mejor es que el chino es un santo y tiene aura![]()
Como pa fiarse de las "reviews", un 20 a eso
Señores de los ESTUDIOS, QUE YA TENEMOS UN BOTÓN EN NUESTRO MANDO PARA AÑADIR SHARPNESS SI QUEREMOS, no nos la metan ustedes con EMBUDO, que EL CELULOIDE NO TIENE ESE FILTRO ASQUEROSO.
Puff, y mirad la captura de las palmeras, las del fondo (parte de arriba) tienen una definición lamentable por culpa de este filtrito garrafero:
http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film2/DVDRevie ... u-ray4.jpg
Que de un 8K saquen eso... pffff, me voy a dormir que me estoy chiscando![]()
DaViD Boulet dijo:My point is that forget the JPEGs altogether. I don't know how there were captured or how they were processed for the web. All I can say is that there is no "edge enhancement" that I could discern from 1 screen width away. I don't see the need to look an closer since 1080p media doesn't support a viewing angle wider than 1 screen width.mhafner dijo:Help me out here. Is this jpeg simply not an accurate still from the disc:
Blue Dress EE
? Is there no white EE haloe on the disc like that? Or is your point that this shot is not typical and the vast majority of the disc is free from such haloes? Or is your point that such haloes in your opinion are too minor to make this disc anything less than the most natural unprocessed picture you have seen from 1080p media? (If the still is accurate then I would have to strongly disagree that this kind of shot looks natural and unprocessed.)
When you watch the actual, in-motion picture, it's the most unprocessed "analog" 1080p picture I've seen.
All I say is that folks should look at the actual disc rather than screen shots and people retort by pointing out screen shots???From the screenshots on both DVDBeaver and Blu-ray.com EE is the least of this transfers problems. Once again reviewers know how to spell DNR but not actually notice it when it's plastered in front of them.
This is av "science"???
Your response is even more perplexing given that the ravages of DNR are not as visibly destructive in a still frame as they are in a moving picture with slowly panning complex detail like skin pores, fabric and textures. Things that are astonishing preserved in Baraka, I should add.
If you want to know what a full-motion 24 frame per second 1080p picture looks like... here's a hint... watch it in motion. If you notice any problems from a proper viewing distance viewing the actual material in motion on the screen then that would be the time to share information. Regurgitating hypothesis based on compromised screen captures is not information, it's conjecture.